I think the review was too focused on image quality comparison at crazy ISO ranges and the bulk of the camera, which to anyone who does a blind test realizes the a7ii is much smaller and lighter than any other Full Frame camera. Both cameras feature 5-axis sensor stabilisation but the A7 III has a more advanced hardware that increases the compensation to 5.0Ev in comparison to the 4.5Ev rating of the A7S II (CIPA standards). The biggest difference you’ll notice with the A7S III is the massive increase in color information that it records with its 10-bit codec. The A7S II uses an 8-bit colors codec, which is only capable of capturing 16.7 Million colors; whereas, a 10-bit codec captures 1.07 Billion.

Sony a7s ii and Sony a7r ii come with a BIONZ X image processing engine. So, with them, you will get faster performance and amazingly color-maintained photos. That is 64x the amount of color information which has a massive effect on banding, color fringing, and accuracy of the final image. When you insert a battery and SD card, the Sony a7r ii weighs 625 grams, and the Sony a7s ii weighs 627 grams. Here, the Sony a7r ii has 2 grams lighter than its opponent. Besides, they come with 126.9 x 95.7 x 60.3 mm dimensions. Though their size is similar, you can handle the Sony a7r ii more comfortably than the other camera. Image Sensor I do wish you'd been specific in mentioning that that photo was taken with the FE35 f/1.4, either by stating that in the write up or by including the EXIF data. I suppose it only stands to reason, since that's the only f 1.4 native lens available, but still... I'm looking for a new FF camera for photo reportaje, photo documentary and street photography, I like to use legaci lenses as well but I'm still veri confused between Sony A7 II and Nikon D750.Whether or not you need a 10-bit full-frame video camera is another matter –if depends on where you're planning to publish your videos and how much grading you tend to do. An 8-bit camera like the A7S II may still be fine for your needs, and it's also worth bearing in mind that there are more affordable 10-bit cameras (albeit with smaller sensors) than the A7S III, such as the Panasonic GH5. 3. Design I’m currently shooting with an A7RII, and Sony lenses (16-35/4.0, 24-70/2.8, 90M/2.8, 70-200/2.8) and looking to add another body to my kit.

They both use the entire width of the sensor to perform full pixel readout without pixel binning, meaning that all the pixel are used to create the video files. Here the A7 III could have a small advantage in terms of sharpness because it uses more pixels (6K of resolution) that is then downscaled to 4K. However when recording at 30p, it performs a small crop on the sensor (1.2x) unlike the A7S II. In our real-world tests, we captured well over an hour of 4K video from a charge, and also enjoyed the fast-charging benefits of its USB-C port (with the A7S II lagging behind with its older micro USB port). 8. Stills shooting a b Murnane, Kevin. "Sony's α7S II Camera Shoots Stunning 4K Video From The International Space Station". Forbes. Archived from the original on September 7, 2017 . Retrieved November 13, 2019.The α7S II's shutter speed range is 30 s to 1/8,000 s for still images. For bulb movies, the shutter speed range is 1/4 s (1/3 s step) to 1/8,000 s. [2] Unfortunately, the conculsion of your testing was not as I wanted it to be... But I think this is not your fault... seems to be the fault of the camera... Then, ask yourself - and I am serious here - "Why am I considering spending this much money on a camera only to shoot JPEG?" Does anyone REALLY need to shoot at a clean 409,500 ISO? If so, you’ll probably have to wait for the A7S XIII.