JP” is attached at the end of the parts number of official Japanese distributed products shipped after April 2017.

Active average power use comparison based on published specs of the 1TB Crucial MX500 SSD and the 1TB Western Digital® Caviar Blue™ WD10EZEX internal hard drive. All other capacities of the Crucial MX500 SSD have comparable active average power consumption specs. used to perform an analysis of the drive for problems with the intent of anticipating hardware failures. What I like about the MX500 SSDs is the price. The MX500 SSDs have always been much cheaper than the competition while offering great performance. The only downside that I can think of is the write endurance which is much lower than what the Samsung 870 EVO offers. A simple way to improve server performance is to replace those slow hard disk drives (HDD) with high-capacity solid-state drives (SDD). SSDs can provide maximum performance at a lower cost than replacing existing servers, and Crucial Technology has an affordable solution to make the decision easier.

Price-wise, the MX500 4TB SSD is hard to beat and comes with features such as hardware encryption, dynamic write acceleration, and can also protect your data in case of a power outage. Finally, as we look at bandwidth across our four configurations, we find the leaders all top out around 4GB/s. This is pretty good since if you look at this in terms of shared file storage (or scratch space with RAID0) you could easily saturate a 10Gb or 25Gb LAN connection. Write performance on both HW and SW RAID0 configurations came in around 3.2GB/s, while HW RAID5 dropped to 2GB/s. Software RAID5 took the biggest read and write hit, coming in at under 1GB/s read and 272MB/s write.

I understand that now Samsung has most of these features in their products, but I can't simply go away from a brand that I trust and have been working with their products for years now with success. The SSDs have been working perfectly, they feel pretty fast too, I love them. They still report 100% life, can't explain that. I'm a satisfied customer and can recommend crucial/micron for workstations. Once again, we are using the AS-SSD software to measure sequential read and write speed of each drive. IOMeter 4KB BenchmarkMany people have made inquiries about the charts in the past so once again please do keep in mind that the Charts have the average performance numbers of each drive recorded and not the peak (highest) ones. Also, although every single one of these programs can help potential buyers choose the right drive for their needs you should also remember that from any kind of benchmark up to real world usage the gap is not small (and usually most differences will go unnoticed by most people). All tests were performed in a fresh Windows 10 Pro x64 installation with every update installed up to the date of this review.

A lot of system integrators and SMBs on a budget still prefer to use hard drives. HDDs are pretty reliable, have high capacity, and have a low cost per TB. Hard drives have been around for years but have not kept up with the advancements in computing power when it comes to performance. but the MX500 uses Dynamic Write Acceleration (DWA) which dynamically shrinks or grows the SLC cache size depending on the amount of data stored on the flash. Other than that, the MX500 4TB capacity is perfect for users who are looking for a large capacity SSD to store their data. To represent a large file usage scenario, we are copying a 5GB ISO image to a different folder on the same drive. Conclusion the 4TB model can handle up to 1000TB (TBW) which equals to about 520GB writes per day. Crucial MX500 SeriesFinance is only available to permanent UK residents aged >18, subject to status, terms and conditions apply. Most SSDs utilize SLC Write Cache to boost write performance which is normally a fixed SLC cache size Some of the storage capacity is used for formatting and other purposes and is not available for data storage. 1GB equals 1 billion bytes. Not all capacities available at initial launch.