SilverCrest Monsieur Cuisine Connect

Product Information

Thanks to the high-quality stainless steel finish and functional packaging, you will enjoy it for a very long time. of the Patent Act 2015, will be determined in the execution phase of the judgment once it becomes final… which may take some time if LIDL, as is foreseeable, files an appeal against this judgment before the Provincial Court of Barcelona (15th Section). This model has preserved the qualities of its predecessor and contributed to the manufacturer’s sales figures. The Masked Singer UK's Owl is unveiled as TV icon leaving viewers gobsmacked as host Joel Dommet declares: 'This is the best reveal we have ever had! It is expressly conceded that the technical solution offered by the patent “is very simple”; and, in spite of this, the existence of inventive step is found to exist.

The judges ruled that technical specifications showed the differences between the cheaper version and that the Thermomix patent didn’t protect against it. This is because the function of weighing is carried out in the Thermomix thanks to a special technology that is independent of the circuit that controls the movement of the jar.

To do this, you need to display a QR code on the kitchen appliance and take a photo of it with the app. But one thing I've discovered is that the Thermomix is perfect for these first-time attempts as the recipes provided work well with very little hassle and anxiety. According to the Court, the essence of the invention claimed in Vorwerk’s patent is that food can be weighed regardless of whether the mixing vessel is secured or not or whether the lid is open or closed if the kitchen machine is plugged into the mains and switched on.

We reach this conclusion considering that the patent does not claim any new solution in relation to the safety system which was already part of the state of the art but merely reproduces a solution of the prior art which consists, in substance, in the fact that the lid cannot be unlocked unless the agitator mechanism is first switched off”. In the Court of Appeals’s view, on the other hand, the solution to the objective technical problem (how to achieve a food processor that combines a safe mechanism and a weighing system independent of the actuation of the switch) would have been obvious to a person skilled in the art, because the patent specification itself stated that the relevant features were already in the closest state of the art (earlier inventions by Braun, Philips, and Ronic). It also alleged that in the process of granting the patent the applicant had incurred in the prohibition of addition of subject matter (art. A. of Spanish patent ES 2 301 589, validation in Spain of European patent EP 1 269 898, owned by Vorwerk (also dismissing the patent nullity action filed by Lidl). In the course of the patent infringement proceedings, Lidl, for its part, also filed a lawsuit against Vorwerk; Lidl is filing a motion to invalidate the Thermomix patent.The court considers that, although the cooking machines were already known, the invention consists in the patented cooking machine operating safely by means of circuits that allow the independent operation of the stirring and weighing devices, in such a way that when the switch is actuated, the stirring vessel stops working, but not the weighing function.